Punjab Rent Act -- Retired employee -- Bonafide need –Petition was filed u/s 13-A, yet, the trial of the case proceeded as if it was a petition u/s 13 – Contention that the petition having been styled u/s 13-A could have only been answered qua the premises which were residential in nature – Now there is no distinction between residential and commercial premises in so far as the bona fide need of a landlord is concerned -- If the respondent wanted to get the demised premises vacated and that too in the evening of his life, it can hardly be said that need was not bona fide. Dr. Madan Lal v. Rattan Singh, 2011(1) L.A.R. 115 (P&H).
No comments:
Post a Comment